The Innovation Firm

IP News Alerts

United States Patent and Trademark Office to Launch Glossary Pilot Program
April 17, 2014 - Hamilton Brook Smith Reynolds Alert
By: Timothy J. Meagher
The new program currently is available only by petition for certain software-oriented patent applications. Applicants are required to include a glossary of patent term definitions...
More »

PTO Issues New Guidance Memorandum for Determining Patent-Eligible Subject Matter
March 17, 2014 - Hamilton Brook Smith Reynolds Alert
By: Eric M. Balicky, Ph.D. and Deirdre E. Sanders
On March 4, 2014, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) published a much-anticipated memorandum announcing a "new procedure" for determining whether a claim is drawn...
More »

No Difference, No Deference: Federal Circuit in Lighting Ballast Maintains De Novo Review for Claim Construction
March 10, 2014 - Hamilton Brook Smith Reynolds Alert
By: Deirdre E. Sanders
Lighting Ballast affirms the de novo standard of review for claim construction on appeal, originally set forth 15 years ago. Continue to watch the case, as Supreme Court review...
More »

Court Rules That Design Patent Scope Can Be Limited By Prosecution History
January 17, 2014 - Hamilton Brook Smith Reynolds Alert
By: Brian T. Moriarty and Mary Lou Wakimura
In a ruling of first impression, the Federal Circuit Court finds that the Doctrine of Prosecution History Estoppel applies to design patents; Doctrine can limit the scope of the...
More »

Federal Circuit to Review Standing Rules in Inter Partes Reexamination Proceedings
December 11, 2013 - Hamilton Brook Smith Reynolds Alert
By: Christopher K. Albert
The Federal Circuit is examining whether third party public interest groups have standing to appeal adverse United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) decisions to the Federal...
More »

A Decision in the First Inter Partes Review - Lessons from Garmin v. Cuozzo for IPRs and Litigation
November 25, 2013 - Hamilton Brook Smith Reynolds Alert
By: Susan G. L. Glovsky and Timothy J. Meagher
In Garmin v. Cuozzo, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued its first final decision after trial in an Inter Partes Review...
More »

New Rule Change May Save Your Patent Application Filing Date or Priority Claim
November 13, 2013 - Hamilton Brook Smith Reynolds Alert
By: Deirdre E. Sanders
A new PTO rule makes important changes providing for: greater ease of filing utility applications; a single standard that applicants may use to revive abandoned applications...
More »

USPTO Reexamination Trumps Federal Court Opinions of Patent Validity
August 21, 2013 - Hamilton Brook Smith Reynolds Alert
By: David E. Brook
A party accused of infringing a patent can fail to invalidate the patent in the courts but still win based on a decision of invalidity in a reexamination proceeding at the United...
More »

« previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next »

United States Patent and Trademark Office to Launch Glossary Pilot Program
April 17, 2014 - Hamilton Brook Smith Reynolds Alert
By: Timothy J. Meagher
The new program currently is available only by petition for certain software-oriented patent applications. Applicants are required to include a glossary of patent term definitions...
More »

PTO Issues New Guidance Memorandum for Determining Patent-Eligible Subject Matter
March 17, 2014 - Hamilton Brook Smith Reynolds Alert
By: Eric M. Balicky, Ph.D. and Deirdre E. Sanders
On March 4, 2014, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) published a much-anticipated memorandum announcing a "new procedure" for determining whether a claim is drawn...
More »

No Difference, No Deference: Federal Circuit in Lighting Ballast Maintains De Novo Review for Claim Construction
March 10, 2014 - Hamilton Brook Smith Reynolds Alert
By: Deirdre E. Sanders
Lighting Ballast affirms the de novo standard of review for claim construction on appeal, originally set forth 15 years ago. Continue to watch the case, as Supreme Court review...
More »

Court Rules That Design Patent Scope Can Be Limited By Prosecution History
January 17, 2014 - Hamilton Brook Smith Reynolds Alert
By: Brian T. Moriarty and Mary Lou Wakimura
In a ruling of first impression, the Federal Circuit Court finds that the Doctrine of Prosecution History Estoppel applies to design patents; Doctrine can limit the scope of the...
More »

Federal Circuit to Review Standing Rules in Inter Partes Reexamination Proceedings
December 11, 2013 - Hamilton Brook Smith Reynolds Alert
By: Christopher K. Albert
The Federal Circuit is examining whether third party public interest groups have standing to appeal adverse United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) decisions to the Federal...
More »

A Decision in the First Inter Partes Review - Lessons from Garmin v. Cuozzo for IPRs and Litigation
November 25, 2013 - Hamilton Brook Smith Reynolds Alert
By: Susan G. L. Glovsky and Timothy J. Meagher
In Garmin v. Cuozzo, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued its first final decision after trial in an Inter Partes Review...
More »

New Rule Change May Save Your Patent Application Filing Date or Priority Claim
November 13, 2013 - Hamilton Brook Smith Reynolds Alert
By: Deirdre E. Sanders
A new PTO rule makes important changes providing for: greater ease of filing utility applications; a single standard that applicants may use to revive abandoned applications...
More »

USPTO Reexamination Trumps Federal Court Opinions of Patent Validity
August 21, 2013 - Hamilton Brook Smith Reynolds Alert
By: David E. Brook
A party accused of infringing a patent can fail to invalidate the patent in the courts but still win based on a decision of invalidity in a reexamination proceeding at the United...
More »

« previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next »

Back to the Top